One way to begin to teach content as a mode of thinking is to recognize the fact that all content areas presuppose not only a particular purposes, but those purposes are connected to organized ways of figuring things out. If students understand the purpose of history, the purpose of literature, the purpose of government, etc. they can begin to learn that there are different things which we as learner try to figure out. Furthermore, they learn that when we want to figure something out, we have to ask particular questions about it. Hence, all subjects presuppose certain fundamental questions which guide thinking within a content area. Some Implications for Instruction. Once we have persuaded most of our students that much of their thinking — left to itself — is flawed and that they, like all of us writing sentences, are capable of improving as thinkers, we must teach in such a way as to help them to see that we all need to regularly practice good thinking to become good thinkers. Here we can use sporting analogies and analogies from other skill areas. Most students already know that you can get good in a sport only if you regularly practice. We must not only look for opportunities to encourage them to think well, we must help them to begin to understand what it is to develop good HABITS of thinking. What do we need to do regularly in order to read well? What must we do regularly and habitually if we are to listen well? What must we do regularly and habitually if we are to write well. What must we do regularly and habitually if we are to learn well? We must recognize that students are not only creatures of habit, but like the rest of us, they are largely unaware of the habits they are developing. They are largely unaware of what it is to develop good habits (in general), let alone good habits of thinking. If our students are truly “beginning” thinkers, they will be receptive to the importance of developing sound habits of thought. We must emphasize the importance of beginning to take charge of the parts of thinking and applying intellectual standards to thinking. We must teach students to begin to recognize their native egocentrism when it is operating in their thinking. the ability and disposition to improve one’s thinking by systematically subjecting it to intellectual self-assessment. Relevant Intellectual Trait. The fundamental intellectual trait at this stage is intellectual humility, in order to see that problems are inherent in one’s thinking. 9) apply more of what they are learning to their everyday life, Relevant Intellectual Traits. The key intellectual trait required at this stage is a high degree of intellectual humility in recognizing egocentric and sociocentric thought in one’s life as well as areas of significant ignorance and prejudice. In addition the thinker at this level needs: a) the intellectual insight and perseverance to actually develop new fundamental habits of thought based on deep values to which one has committed oneself, b) the intellectual integrity to recognize areas of inconsistency and contradiction in one’s life, c) the intellectual empathy necessary to put oneself in the place of others in order to genuinely understand them, d) the intellectual courage to face and fairly address ideas, beliefs, or viewpoints toward which one has strong negative emotions, e) the fair-mindedness necessary to approach all viewpoints without prejudice, without reference to one’s own feelings or vested interests. In the advanced thinker these traits are emerging, but may not be manifested at the highest level or in the deepest dimensions of thought. Stage Four: The Practicing Thinker The Advantages of Critical Thinking Stage Three: The Beginning Thinker Due to space limitations buy research papers, we have made no attempt to be exhaustive with respect to any stage, nor to answer the many questions that might be raised concerning the development, reliability or validity of the stages. The basic intention is to provide a practical organizer for teachers interested in using a conceptual map to guide student thinking through developmental stages in the process of becoming critical thinkers. Once the stages are explained, and stage-specific recommendations are given, we close with some global implications for instruction. Some Implications for Instruction: For the foreseeable future most of our students will not become advanced thinkers — if at all — until college or beyond. Nevertheless, it is important that they learn what it would be to become an advanced thinker. It is important that they see it as an important goal. We can help students move in this direction by fostering their awareness of egocentrism and sociocentrism in their thinking, by leading discussions on intellectual perseverance, intellectual integrity, intellectual empathy, intellectual courage, and fair-mindedness. If we can graduate students who are practicing thinkers, we will have achieved a major break-through in schooling. However intelligent our graduates may be, most of them are largely unreflective as thinkers a good dissertation is a done dissertation, and are unaware of the disciplined habits of thought they need to develop to grow intellectually as a thinker. For example if we teach all courses with emphasis on the parts, or intellectual elements of thinking, we can help students discover content as a mode of thinking at the same time they are discovering their minds as thinkers. In fact, to effectively learn any subject in an intellectually meaningful way presupposes a certain level of command over one’s thinking examples of the best college essays, which in turn presupposes understanding of the mind’s processes. General Implications for Instruction 12) express themselves precisely and exactly, We believe that the thinking of students will remain "invisible" to them unless they are supportively challenged to discover the problems in their thinking. This is not possible unless they receive careful introduction into the intellectual workings of the human mind. Thus it is vital that an intellectual vocabulary for talking about the mind be established for teachers; and that teachers lead discussions in class designed to teach students, from the point of view of intellectual quality, how their minds work mistaken identity essay, including how they can improve as thinkers. Knowledge of Thinking: Unreflective thinkers lack the knowledge that high quality thinking requires regular practice in taking thinking apart, accurately assessing it, and actively improving it. In fact, unreflective thinkers are largely unaware of thinking as such, hence fail to recognize thinking as involving concepts, assumptions, inferences, implications school argumentative essay topics, points of view, etc. Unreflective thinkers are largely unaware of the appropriate standards for the assessment of thinking: clarity, accuracy, precision, relevance, logicalness, etc. 7) understand more of what you present in class, What are the basic features of thinking that students need to know to effectively take charge of their thinking intellectually, with respect to any content? First, they must come to realize that whenever humans reason, they have no choice but to use certain elements, without which their thinking would be intellectually unintelligible. Consider. Stage One: The Unreflective Thinker 3) gather and organize information and data, Skill in Thinking. Beginning thinkers are able to appreciate a critique of their powers of thought. Beginning thinkers have enough skill in thinking to begin to monitor their own thoughts, though as “beginners” they are sporadic in that monitoring. They are beginning to recognize egocentric thinking in themselves and others. Thinking is inevitably driven by the questions we seek to answer, and those questions we seek to answer for some purpose. To answer questions, we need information which is in fact meaningful to us only if we interpret it (i.e. by making inferences). Our inferences, in turn, are based on assumptions and require that we use ideas or concepts to organize the information in some way from some point of view. Last but not least, our thinking not only begins somewhere intellectually (in certain assumptions), it also goes somewhere---that is critical thinking and writing about literature, has implications and consequences. Skill in Thinking. Unreflective thinkers may have developed a variety of skills in thinking without being aware of them. However, these skills are inconsistently applied because of the lack of self-monitoring of thought. Prejudices and misconceptions often undermine the quality of thought of the unreflective thinker. Principal Challenge. To begin to see the importance of developing as a thinker. To begin to seek ways to develop as a thinker and to make an intellectual commitment to that end. 11) stick to questions, issues, or problems; and not wander in their thinking, 10) test and check for accuracy, Defining Feature. Thinkers at this stage have a sense of the habits they need to develop to take charge of their thinking. They not only recognize that problems exist in their thinking math problem solvers, but they also recognize the need to attack these problems globally and systematically. Based on their sense of the need to practice regularly, they are actively analyzing their thinking in a number of domains. However, since practicing thinkers are only beginning to approach the improvement of their thinking in a systematic way, they still have limited insight into deeper levels of thought, and thus into deeper levels of the problems embedded in thinking. 1) state and explain goals and purposes, Knowledge of Thinking. Accomplished thinkers are not only actively and successfully engaged in systematically monitoring the role in their thinking of concepts, assumptions, inferences, implications, points of view, etc. but are also regularly improving that practice. Accomplished thinkers have not only a high degree of knowledge of thinking, but a high degree of practical insight as well. Accomplished thinkers intuitively assess their thinking for clarity, accuracy, precision, relevance, logicalness, etc. Accomplished thinkers have deep insights into the systematic internalization of critical thinking into their habits. Accomplished thinkers deeply understand the role that egocentric and sociocentric thinking plays in the lives of human beings, as well as the complex relationship between thoughts, emotions dog essays, drives and behavior. Stage One: The Unreflective Thinker Relevant Intellectual Traits. Naturally inherent in master thinkers are all the essential intellectual characteristics, deeply integrated. Accomplished thinkers have a high degree of intellectual humility, intellectual integrity, intellectual perseverance, intellectual courage, intellectual empathy thanks for your revision, intellectual autonomy, intellectual responsibility and fair-mindedness. Egocentric and sociocentric thought is quite uncommon in the accomplished thinker, especially with respect to matters of importance. There is a high degree of integration of basic values, beliefs, desires, emotions, and action. Principal Challenge. To begin to develop depth of understanding not only of the need for systematic practice in thinking best topics to research, but also insight into deep levels of problems in thought: consistent recognition, for example, of egocentric and sociocentric thought in one’s thinking, ability to identify areas of significant ignorance and prejudice, and ability to actually develop new fundamental habits of thought based on deep values to which one has committed oneself. Stage 4 The Practicing Thinker (we recognize the necessity of regular practice) Stage 1 The Unreflective Thinker (we are unaware of significant problems in our thinking)
0 Commentaires
Laisser une réponse. |