6. "LOGICAL ERRORS" Make sure you develop an argument in your essay. That means that you must have a conclusion and and premises that lead to that conclusion. 1. 1. Write in paragraphs. In philosophy you are committed to argumentation, which requires several sentences that support your position. Each paragraph ought to address a fairly identifiable topic related to the theme of your essay. A poorly organized essay will not receive an A. MOST FREQUENT MISTAKES 5. 5. Avoid scriptural and other religious justification for your position. You may support a religious view with sound moral arguments but you may not simply plead to the authority of sacred texts or authorities. 4. 4. Be logical. Try not to contradict yourself and avoid lousy arguments like: "I was always taught X was wrong therefore it must be." or, "John Smith letter of scholarship application, a famous philosopher, said Y is right therefore it must be." CARDINAL RULE 3. Work from a detailed outline. If you are having trouble ask me to look at your outline for suggestions. GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR WRITING ESSAY EXAMS CARDINAL RULE 1. Never turn in an essay that flaunts obvious typing errors such as: uneven margins examples essay writing help, improper indentation or spacing between paragraphs buy research papers, or typographical errors. This immediately communicates to me and any other professor that your essay was thrown together last minute without much thought or effort. CARDINAL RULE 5. Start on the exams as soon as possible. Don't wait until the night before it's due before you start. You'll need to write more than one draft. View samples of student work with lecturer and student comments. In the Meno. Meno presents Socrates with a paradox about inquiry. There is no way to inquire into something that you don’t know, since you don’t know how to begin human resources cover letter email, but there is also no way to inquire into something that you already know opinion argument essay, since you already have the knowledge in question. Thus, we reach the paradoxical conclusion that inquiry is impossible. Socrates attempts to unravel Meno’s paradox by presenting his theory of recollection. In what follows, I will argue that Socrates does not adequately defend his theory of recollection. However, I will also suggest that even if we were to accept the theory of recollection, this would not provide an adequate answer to Meno’s paradox. Make sure that you have read all of the relevant texts very carefully. Even though you have probably read these texts previously, it is a good idea to reread them in light of the question you plan to answer. In the Meno. Meno presents Socrates with a paradox about inquiry. There is no way to inquire into something that you don’t know sample topics for an expository essay, since you don’t know how to begin buy research paper plagiarism, but there is also no way to inquire into something that you already know, since you already have the knowledge in question. Thus, we reach the paradoxical conclusion that inquiry is impossible. Socrates attempts to unravel Meno’s paradox by presenting his theory of recollection. In what follows, I will discuss Meno’s paradox and Socrates’ criticism of it. Do briefly tell your reader what your paper is about and what your main thesis is. Notice that there is a difference between telling your reader what you are going to talk about and telling your reader what you will argue. Compare: The second of these introductions is superior to the first. Notice that only the second presents an actual thesis statement. As you re-read your paper, think about whether it is organized in the best way. Would it be more effective if this paragraph went here get your english assignment done for you, and that one went there? Very often, our first efforts need a rather serious structural overhaul. Also, look for opportunities to improve your paper, such as adding an example here, rewriting an awkward sentence there, and so on… When you use an unfamiliar or “technical” term (i.e. a term that we have given some specific meaning in this class) be sure to define it. Don’t end with a hedged claim like “Though Socrates’ argument is strong, his opponents also have good points.” Also try to avoid the temptation to end with an empty prediction about continued debate: “Though Meno’s definition of virtue is a good one buy a business plan, the philosophical debate over what it means to be virtuous will no doubt continue.” As a rule, you should not use quotes. A series of quotes strung together, even creatively strung together, is not a paper. The main reason to quote a passage is to make it more convenient for you to talk about what the passage says (and to make it more convenient for your reader as well). Thus, you should not rely on a quotation to answer a key part of the question. Answer in your own words instead.
0 Commentaires
Laisser une réponse. |